麦哲学术JournalofManagementStudies（JMS）2019年12月刊论文摘要汇编

原标题：麦哲学术：Journal of Management Studies（JMS）2019年12月刊论文摘要汇编

本文转编于微信大众号：麦哲学术

获取更多办理学威望期刊学术前沿，请重视咱们！

An Empirical Assessment of the Influence of March and Simon’s Organizations: The Realized Contribution and Unfulfilled Promise of a Masterpiece

作者：Marc H. Anderson Russell K. Lemken

March和Simon的安排是办理研讨的开创性作业。咱们经过引证来自尖端办理期刊的1,400篇文章的引证布景剖析，评价安排对办理研讨的奉献。经过对后续作业中引证的安排内容进行分类，咱们发现自1990年以来，与认知极限，例行程序或程序相关的两个相关类别占一切引文上下文的一半（50.5％）。咱们还查询了对安排的引文是外围引证仍是外围引证关于被引证的作者的建议至关重要，被引证的内容怎么跟着时刻的改变而改变，以及被引证的作品在多大程度上为查验March和Simon的建议供给了实证依据，或许对他们的建议持批评态度。咱们的查询提醒了很少有经历地测验验证安排中的断语的测验。整体而言，咱们对后来的奖学金怎么到达方针并做出许诺标明晰批判性的考虑。

March and Simon’s Organizations is a seminal work in management studies. We assess the contribution Organizations has made to management studies through a citation context analysis of 1,400 articles from top management journals. By categorizing the content from Organizations cited in subsequent works, we find that two related categories associated with cognitive limits and routines or programs account for half (50.5%) of all citation contexts since 1990. We also investigate whether citations to Organizations have been peripheral or substantial to the citing authors’ claims, how cited content has changed over time, and the extent to which citing works have provided empirical evidence to test March and Simon’s propositions or have been critical of their assertions. Our investigation reveals disturbingly few attempts to empirically validate the assertions made in Organizations. Overall, we provide a critical reflection on how well subsequent scholarship fulfils the aims and promise heralded by this masterpiece.

60 Years of March and Simon’s Organizations: An Empirical Examination of its Impact and Influence on Subsequent Research

作者：Ralf Wilden Jan Hohberger Timothy M. Devinney Fabrice Lumineau

咱们对March和Simon的安排对办理研讨的影响进行了剖析和系统的查看，并评论了该书对当时研讨的价值百科，并提出了该书的未来运用。依据文献计量和文本发掘的办法，咱们的实证剖析标明，虽然安排在上下文上依据1950年代的工业环境，但其概念已在学者中不断产生共识。此外，咱们发现这种共识很大程度上是由不同“思维门户”中的学者从三月和西蒙的广义理论结构中找到有用的见地的才能所驱动的。可是，咱们还观察到，在曩昔60年中，学者们在挑选本书时运用了一些思维。依据咱们的剖析，咱们提出了一组特定的未来研讨范畴，包含对新的安排形式的重视以及将March和Simon的思维扩展到多层次研讨，这能够从更全面地学习安排并结合其原始思维来处理当时问题中获益。

We provide an analytic and systematic review of the impact of March and Simon’s seminal Organizations on management research and discuss the book’s value for current research and propose future applications of it. Building on bibliometric and text‐mining approaches, our empirical analysis reveals that although Organizations was contextually based in the industrial milieu of the 1950s, its concepts have found ongoing resonance with scholars. Further, we find that much of this resonance appears to be driven by the ability of scholars in different ‘schools of thought’ to find useful insights from March and Simon’s generalized theoretical structure. However, we also observe that scholars have been selective in their usage of ideas from the book over the last 60 years. based our analysis, we propose a particular set of future research areas, including a focus on new organizational forms and extending March and Simon’s ideas to multi‐level research, which can benefit from more holistically drawing on Organizations and connect its original ideas to address current management problems.

Attainment Discrepancy and New Geographic Market Entry: The Moderating Roles of Vertical Pay Disparity and Horizontal Pay Dispersion

作者：Elizabeth Lim

行为战略文献的研讨查看了成果差异对新的地舆商场进入的影响，但成果尚无结论。 经过考虑会集办理人员薪酬距离对纵向薪酬差异和横向薪酬涣散的调节作用，咱们阐明晰成果差异与新的地舆商场进入之间的联络。 该结构还经过辨认特定类型的薪酬距离契合或违背理论猜测的绩效布景，有助于咱们对竞赛理论和社会比较理论的了解。 依据1996年至2006年规范普尔（S＆P）500强企业的面板数据进行的经历剖析标明，咱们的假定得到了广泛支撑。

Studies in the behavioural strategy literature have examined the influence of attainment discrepancy on new geographic market entry with inconclusive results. We clarified the relationship between attainment discrepancy and new geographic market entry by considering the moderating effects of managerial pay gaps with concentration on vertical pay disparity and horizontal pay dispersion. The framework also contributes to our understanding of tournament theory and social comparison theory by identifying specified performance contexts under which types of pay gaps conform to or violate theoretical predictions. Empirical analyses based on a panel data of Standard and Poor’s (S&P) 500 firms from 1996 to 2006 showed that our hypotheses are largely supported.

Causality Rules: Performance Feedback on Hierarchically Related Goals and Capital Investment Variability

作者：Ambra Mazzelli Robert S. Nason Alfredo De Massis Josip Kotlar

咱们经过区别两种分配留意力的规矩（优先次序与因果联络）来扩展March和Simon（1958）对战略决议方案的剖析。 咱们开展了与因果联络规矩有关的理论，而这些因果联络规矩在从前的文献中已被疏忽。 具体来说，咱们研讨了对中心生产率方针和更高阶赢利方针的绩效反应怎么独登时一起影响公司本钱出资的可变性。 对2,477家西班牙制作公司的面板剖析显现，这些方针经过优先和因果联络重视规矩一起影响本钱出资的可变性。 咱们的研讨为企业怎么样处理多个方针，解构绩效反应并应对有限理性的留意束缚供给了新见地。

We extend March and Simon’s (1958) analysis of strategic decisions by distinguishing between two rules for allocating attention – priority versus causality. We develop theory concerning causality rules which have been largely overlooked in prior literature. Specifically, we examine how performance feedback on the intermediate productivity goal and the higher‐order profitability goal independently and jointly influence the variability of firm capital investments. Panel analysis of 2,477 Spanish manufacturing firms reveals that these goals jointly affect the variability of capital investments through both priority and causality attention rules. Our study provides new insights on how firms handle multiple goals, deconstruct performance feedback, and cope with the attentional constraints of bounded rationality.

The Manager’s Notepad: Working Memory, Exploration, and Performance

作者：Daniella Laureiro‐Martinez Stefano Brusoni Amulya Tata Maurizio Zollo

这项研讨依据March和Simon的建议，即在解说决议方案绩效时有必要考虑个人水平的差异。咱们扩展了他们对决议方案者留意在解说同一不确定环境中的异构勘探和开发形式的重要性方面的评论。咱们建立了不确定性下的决议方案模型，其间“作业记忆”（即紧记多个要素以自动处理这些要素的才能）解说了勘探开发挑选形式中异质性的呈现。咱们在实验室研讨中验证了该模型，并进行了两次仿制，触及171个人。咱们的发现标明，作业记忆的差异使咱们也能够辨认出更或许恰当挑选探究而不是克扣的人，然后取得更高的绩效。咱们评论了办理理论的意义，并从头提出了March和Simon的作业作为一致结构，该结构仍可用于生成和查验与办理相关的假定。

This study builds upon March and Simon’s proposition that individual‐level differences must be considered when explaining decision‐making performance. We extend their discussion on the importance of decision‐makers’ attention to explain heterogeneous patterns of exploration and exploitation within the same uncertain environment. We develop a model of decision‐making under uncertainty in which ‘working memory’ – i.e., the ability to hold multiple elements in mind to actively process them – explains the emergence of heterogeneity in exploration‐exploitation choice patterns. We validated the model in a laboratory study and two replications involving 171 individuals. Our findings show that differences in working memory allow us to identify individuals who are more likely to choose exploration over exploitation appropriately, and thus achieve higher performance. We discuss the implications for management theories, and re‐propose the work of March and Simon as a unifying framework that still can be used to generate and test managerially relevant hypotheses.

The Dynamics of Embedded Rules: How Do Rule Networks Affect Knowledge Uptake of Rules in Healthcare?

作者：Kejia Zhu Martin Schulz

安排和其他地方的规矩一般与与相似或相关行为有关的其他规矩相关联，而且一般构成构成整个安排和辖区的规矩网络。虽然规矩网络是一种常见现象，可是到目前为止，它们对规矩更改的影响不为人知。规矩嵌入规矩网络后怎么更改？咱们以绩效方案，安排学习和安排常识的从前概念为根底，探究规矩网络特征怎么影响规矩的不一样的常识吸收修订。咱们的剖析是定量的和纵向的，并运用加拿大区域医疗机构中临床实践攻略的档案数据。咱们的发现标明，入站攻略网络会极大地影响其修订。咱们的研讨标明，规矩网络决议着规矩对常识的吸收的速度和方向。规矩是动态的，其具体阐明取决于途径和网络。

Rules – in organizations and elsewhere – often become connected to other rules pertinent to similar or related action, and often they form rule networks that structure entire organizations and jurisdictions. Although rule networks are a common phenomenon, their effects on rule change have found little attention so far. How do rules change when they become embedded in rule networks? We build on prior conceptions of performance programs, organizational learning, and organizational knowledge to explore how rule network characteristics affect different types of knowledge uptake revisions of rules. Our analysis is quantitative and longitudinal and draws on archival data of clinical practice guidelines in a Canadian regional healthcare organization. Our findings indicate that the inbound networks of guidelines significantly affect their revisions. Our study suggests that rule networks shape the speed and direction of knowledge uptake of rules. Rules are dynamic, and their elaboration is path dependent and network dependent.

The Hierarchical Erosion Effect: A New Perspective on Perceptual Differences and Business Performance

作者：Cristina B. Gibson Julian Birkinshaw Dana McDaniel Sumpter Tina Ambos

安排是具有不同爱好和知道的个人的联盟（March和Simon，1958/1993）。咱们研讨了异质性的重要来历，即个别在不同层次上持有的不同观点。咱们引入了等级腐蚀效应的概念，在这种效应中，关于特定实践的个人观点在等级系统中越低越晦气。运用来自38个业务部门中四个等级的4,243名职工的数据，咱们供给了这种影响存在的依据，并操控了其他要素，包含八种实践中业务部门文明的整体有利性。咱们展现了这种分层腐蚀效应的巨细怎么随所评价的安排实践的性质以及高管广泛同享战略信息的程度而改变，而且还标明晰较低的分层腐蚀效应与较高的业务部门增加相关。经过这样做，咱们加深了对March和Simon作业的两个方面的了解，即他们对安排内部异质性的观点以及对等级性质的共同观点。

Organizations are coalitions of individuals with heterogeneous interests and perceptions (March and Simon, 1958/1993). We examine an important source of heterogeneity, namely the different perceptions individuals hold across hierarchical levels. We introduce the notion of a hierarchical erosion effect whereby individual perceptions about specific practices become less favourable the lower one goes in the hierarchy. Using data from 4,243 employees across four levels in 38 business units, we provide evidence that this effect exists, controlling for other factors, including the overall favourability of the business unit culture across eight practices. We show how the size of this hierarchical erosion effect varies depending on the nature of the organizational practice being evaluated and the extent to which executives share strategic information widely, and we also show that a lower hierarchical erosion effect is correlated with higher business unit growth. In doing so, we enrich understanding of two aspects of March and Simon's work, their notion of intra‐organizational heterogeneity and their distinctive view of the nature of hierarchy.

获取更多学术前沿咨询请重视咱们

大众号查找：麦哲学术

办理学范畴学术前沿速递

研讨学者常识沟通共享渠道

仅用于学术沟通，原文版权归原作者和原宣布刊物一切

请尊重对常识的支付，转载请联络咱们！

责任编辑：